icon
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
bg element
Your audits keep finding the same problems. Nothing is changing on the ground.

On-Ground Supplier Improvement Sprint

A hands-on 90-day sprint to turn audit findings into real improvements inside your supplier facilities in India, with on-ground coaching.

Not ready yet? Download field guide

PDF

field guide . 24 pages

What Global Teams Miss When Visiting Indian Suppliers

"Genuinely rare in this space."

Ben Thornton-Jones

Ex- Director, Sustainable Supply Global Sustainability, Haleon

Already serving clients from these countries

World of Gears works directly on the ground with suppliers across India,  inside factories, farms, and supply chains, to understand how risks show up in practice, not just on paper.
I started my career on the shop floor and worked my way up through operations and supply chains. I understand supplier systems from the inside, how they're designed, how they're used, and where they break in real conditions.
We don't hand over action plans and leave. We stay until something actually changes.
— Rishi Sher Singh, Founder · World of Gears
PROBLEM

Why This Keeps Happening, Despite All the Audits

Most companies aren't starting from zero. Audits are done. Suppliers are engaged. Findings are documented. And yet — very little changes where it matters.
01 - Supply Chain

Audits identify problems. They don't fix them.

Audits are designed to assess and report, not to change behaviour. The same issues return not because they were missed, but because nothing changed in how work actually happens on the ground.

02 - Contextual Risks

What works at HQ doesn't translate on the ground.

Systems that work in Europe or Japan assume structure and capacity that doesn't exist in the same way inside Indian factories and farms. What looks simple from a distance becomes complex when it meets contractor layers, informal practices, and daily operational pressure.

03 - Superficial Insights

Systems exist, but aren't used.

Policies get written. Processes get defined. But unless they are understood and used by people on the ground, they remain documents. The gap between "system in place" and "system in use" is where most risks continue to sit.

04 - Audit Limits

Direction doesn't create ownership.

Suppliers comply with audit findings, but real change requires ownership. That only happens when suppliers are part of the process, not just recipients of instructions. Without it, actions get completed for the audit, but never embed into daily operations.

05 - Regulatory Pressure

The relationship is set up to evaluate, not improve.

When engagement is driven by audits, suppliers respond accordingly. They prepare, present, and protect. What's missing is a way of working where suppliers feel supported to improve, not just assessed.

Suppliers agree to everything, and change very little.

The meeting is designed for agreement, not understanding. The pressure to say yes, to protect the relationship, to keep the contract — it shapes every answer in that room. The real constraints, the ones that determine what actually changes after you leave, rarely make it onto the table.

You leave with data. Not with a clear picture.

Forms get completed. Photographs get taken. What doesn't happen is a frank conversation about what's going wrong, why it keeps going wrong, and what it would actually take to fix it. The gap between what's documented and what's real stays exactly where it was.

And the pressure isn't going away.

The EU's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, the German Supply Chain Act, the UK Modern Slavery Act — these aren't future considerations. The question your board and investors are now asking isn't whether you conducted a supplier visit. It's what you found, and what changed as a result.

The same issues return, across audit cycles, across years. Critical suppliers remain high-risk but difficult to replace. Internal teams spend more time tracking actions than seeing real change. And at HQ, it becomes harder to show how policies are actually improving conditions on the ground.

The result: a system that produces findings, but struggles to produce change.

— Rishi Sher Singh, Founder · World of Gears

Is this right for you?

This is for you if:

You have suppliers in India where the same issues keep coming up despite multiple audits

You’re under pressure to show how ESG and human rights policies translate into real action

You have strategic suppliers you can’t easily replace — and need to improve

Your sustainability and procurement teams both see the problem — and are willing to work together to solve it

You’re ready to move beyond audits and invest time in real, on-ground change

This is not for you if:

You are only looking for audits, certifications, or compliance reports

You want a standard, remote, template-driven ESG or HRDD programme

You expect suppliers to fix issues on their own after receiving audit findings

You are not able to invest time engaging with suppliers beyond formal reviews

You are looking for quick fixes without changing how engagement actually happens

the guide

Who does this work

Rishi Sher Singh has spent 25 years inside the supply chains most global teams only read reports about.
On-Ground Origin

Rishi didn't come into this work through frameworks. He came into it through factories and farms, starting on the shop floor, working his way up through operations and supply chains.

25 Years Across Sectors

Mint units in Uttar Pradesh. Sugar mills in Maharashtra. Garment factories in Tirupur. Farms in Andhra Pradesh. Across 25 years and 100+ engagements, one thing kept repeating: the gap was never about knowing what was wrong. It was about how to fix it on the ground.

His approach is grounded in Kaizen, learned directly from Professor Yamaguchi, one of its leading teachers.

Why Suppliers Trust Him

Suppliers see Rishi differently, not as someone evaluating them, but as someone who has worked inside systems like theirs. He's directly involved in every engagement, backed by a small team with 15+ years each in factories and supply chains, working alongside supplier teams until change holds.

25+

Years of practical supply chain implementation experience

100+

ESG and HRDD implementation projects across 17 countries

Advised global think-tanks on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

Former Hewlett Packard supply chain leader who understands how MNCs and their supply chains really work

20+

Human Rights Impact Assessments

10,000+

Managers and Workers trained

He holds an engineering degree and an MBA. In practice, that means he can read a factory floor and a procurement requirements with equal fluency, and talk to a supplier operations director in terms they find credible, not just in the language of compliance.

Partnered with CRT Japan to support Japanese corporations in Indian supply chains

Over 25 years, he has:

  • Led more than 100 ESG and HRDD projects across 17 countries, from factories to farms
  • Designed Hewlett-Packard's first supplier capability programme
  • Trained more than 10,000 managers, supervisors, and workers in responsible business practice
  • Advised global think-tanks on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
  • Partnered with CRT Japan to support Japanese corporations in Indian supply chains

He holds an engineering degree and an MBA. In practice, that means he can read a factory floor and a procurement requirements with equal fluency — and talk to a supplier operations director in terms they find credible, not just in the language of compliance.

"Sustainability felt less like a compliance demand and more like a way to strengthen our business and our people. What stood out most was their human approach, engaging directly with our workers, guiding our managers with patience, and making us feel like real partners."

— Supplier in the Mint Supply Chain
The method

The 90-Day Supplier Improvement Sprint

This is not a programme. It's a focused, on-ground sprint.

Over 90 days, we work inside supplier facilities, with management, supervisors, and workers, to turn audit findings into improvements that actually hold. 

Stage 1
Align on What Matters

The work begins by aligning with your team and the supplier, not just on what needs to improve, but why it matters and where things are breaking down. Priorities are clarified: which risks are critical, where the gaps really sit, and who within the supplier needs to take ownership. Without this shared clarity, improvement efforts drift.

stage 2
 Work Inside the System

Within days, we are on the ground, inside the factory or farm — working with supervisors, HR teams, contractor managers, and workers. The focus is on understanding how work actually happens in real conditions. Where systems hold, where they break, and what gets bypassed. This ground-level view is what makes the difference between theory and something that can actually work.

stage 3
Build Ownership, Not Instructions

Instead of handing over action plans, we work alongside supplier teams to shape solutions they can own. Changes are developed in context, small, practical, and tested in real situations. Improvement that is imposed rarely lasts. Improvement that is built together tends to hold.

stage 4
Strengthen Systems That Are Used

The focus shifts to making systems usable in daily operations. Policies are translated into simple practices, grievance mechanisms workers trust, safety practices that hold during busy periods, contractor management that works on the ground. The goal is not perfect systems, but systems people can and will use.

stage 5
Coach Through Real Situations

Improvement happens when real issues come up. We stay engaged through those moments, coaching teams as they respond, supporting decisions, and strengthening capability. Over time, managers and supervisors begin handling situations independently. Improvements become part of how the site operates, not something driven from outside.

This is where audit findings start turning into change that actually holds on the ground.

One Size Doesn't Fit All

Most approaches stop at telling suppliers what to fix. We stay until something actually changes.

Grievance mechanisms, safety, contractor practices, gender equality, the areas vary. The approach doesn't: focus on what matters most and make it work in real conditions. Clear process, practical application.

Customer testimonials

Here are the thoughts of our esteemed clients on their experience working with us.

“What stood out most was their human approach — engaging directly with our workers, guiding our managers with patience, and making us feel like real partners. For the first time, sustainability felt less like a compliance demand and more like a way to strengthen both our business and our people.”

Mint Processing Supplier

Uttar Pradesh

“The World of Gears team felt like part of our own team. They took the time to understand our situation, explained the expectations clearly, and helped us see where we could improve. What made the difference was that they stayed with us in the factory — working through the changes as they happened. We’ve seen real improvement, and our customer has noticed it too.”

Senior Manager

Sugar Mill, Maharashtra

“World of Gears helped us implement grievance mechanisms across our factories in a practical way. By training our managers and supporting worker awareness, they created real ownership on the ground. Today, workers are actively raising improvement ideas, and trust in the system has grown significantly.”

HR Leader

FMCG Company, India

Recent work

India
Industrial

Grievance Mechanisms, From Policy to Trusted Practice

A leading Indian manufacturing group had a grievance mechanism aligned with UNGPs. At factory level, it wasn't being used — workers didn't trust it, managers were unsure how to handle cases. The work focused on three sites: senior managers were trained using real scenarios, worker awareness sessions were run across shifts in simple local language, and teams were coached as real grievances came in. Over time, factory teams became confident handling cases independently. Workers began raising issues more openly — including sensitive concerns that had previously stayed hidden. The system moved from a compliance requirement to a locally owned, trusted process.

India
Automotive

Safety Improvements, Making Systems Work in EV Manufacturing

A fast-growing EV manufacturer had safety policies in place, but shop-floor practices were inconsistent — especially during high-production periods. Rather than introducing new systems, the approach focused on making existing ones work in real conditions. Supervisors were coached through real scenarios, learning to identify and act on risks themselves. Near misses were discussed more openly. Interventions happened earlier. The result was a visible, sustained shift in safety behaviour — driven by factory teams and holding even under operational pressure.

FAILURE STAKES

The cost of carrying on as you are

Without real supplier improvement, audits are just a cost line on your budget.
"It doesn't have to stay this way."
Eroding Trust

Without real improvement, the same risks sit inside your supplier operations, year after year. For critical suppliers, this creates a slow strain. Trust weakens. Assurance of stable, responsible supply becomes uncertain.

Mounting Cost

Budgets keep going to repeated audits without proportional improvement. Reporting gets harder to stand behind as questions shift from "what did you assess?" to "what actually changed?"

Stalled Growth

As India becomes a key sourcing and growth market, these gaps reach beyond compliance. Expanding with suppliers that aren't improving increases exposure, limits confidence, and pressures long-term plans — especially for companies that lead with values, not just revenue.

Real growth in India starts not with strategy, but with supplier capability.

To make that happen, you need the right kind of engagement — practical, on-ground, and focused on improvement.

— Rishi Sher Singh, Founder · World of Gears
SUCCESS STATE

What a 90-Day Sprint Looks Like

Focused on the right risks, built with local ownership, improved step by step on the ground.

This is what brings your Supplier Code of Conduct to life.

It starts with a conversation — not to review findings again, but to understand what is actually getting in the way. Within days, Rishi is on the ground — walking the factory floor, sitting with managers, supervisors, and workers, seeing how things actually operate.

There is no big launch. The work begins in small, practical ways — guiding a supervisor on a safety issue, helping a manager handle a grievance, working through real situations as they come up. We don't implement the changes for the supplier. We guide the process — enabling their teams to take ownership.

Over time, confidence builds. Managers handle issues independently. Supervisors catch problems earlier. Workers engage more openly. Systems don't become perfect — but they start working.

By the end of 90 days, the shift is visible — not just in documents, but in how the site runs day to day. The supplier relationship strengthens. You have tangible improvements to stand behind in your reporting. And your values around people and responsible sourcing are no longer statements — they're visible on the ground.

Let's Get Started
Free Practical Guide
FAQ

What clients ask most often?

We’ve already done multiple audits — will this still help?
Do you work across different sectors and locations in India?
How is this different from another audit or assessment?
Do you conduct a follow-up impact assessment after the 90-day sprint?
What does this typically cost?

How we can help your business

Flagship Service
arrow

HRDD & ESG Advisory

A 12-month advisory for Sustainability, Human Rights and Procurement leaders who need a trusted, experienced sounding board to navigate complex factory and supplier realities in India.

Start with a Conversation

If you’re moving beyond supplier audits — and want to see real improvement on the ground at your suppliers — let’s talk.

In 30 minutes with Rishi, you’ll get practical clarity on how to turn audit findings into changes that actually work inside factories and farms.

You speak directly with Rishi. No slides. No preparation. He'll ask a few focused questions — what audits have been done, what keeps repeating, where things are getting stuck. From that, he'll tell you honestly where the gap is and what to do next.

World of Gears takes on a limited number of engagements at any one time. Rishi is directly involved in each one. If you have key suppliers in India where improvement matters, this is the right time to talk.

Talk To Rishi
Free Practical Guide
Blog

Our latest articles

Discover insights and strategies that protect your supply chains, investments, reduce regulatory risk, and drive long-term value through responsible business practices

All Posts
Services Image
When the Biggest Barrier to Supplier Engagement in India Isn't the Supplier
You've built the framework. Written the policy. Designed the assessment. And still, nothing is actually changing on the ground.
Read Details